Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19457835.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2214/AJR.08.1625.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The objective of our study was to investigate whether an increasing number of computer-aided detection (CAD) false-positives decreases reader sensitivity, specificity, and confidence for nonexpert readers of CT colonography (CTC). Fifty CTC data sets (29 men; mean age, 65 years), 25 of which contained 35 polyps > or = 5 mm, were selected in which CAD had 100% polyp sensitivity at two sphericity settings (0 and 75) but differed in the number of false-positives. The data sets were read by five readers twice: once at each sphericity setting. Sensitivity, specificity, report time, and confidence before and after second-read CAD were compared using the paired exact and Student's t test, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated using reader confidence (1-100) in correct case classification (normal or abnormal). CAD generated a mean of 42 (range, 3-118) and 15 (range, 1-36) false-positives at a sphericity of 0 and 75, respectively. CAD at both settings increased per-patient sensitivity from 82% to 87% (p = 0.03) and per-polyp sensitivity by 8% and 10% for a sphericity of 0 and 75, respectively (p < 0.001). Specificity decreased from 84% to 79% (sphericity 0 and 75, p = 0.03 and 0.07). There was no difference in sensitivity, specificity, or reader confidence between sphericity settings (p = 1.0, 1.0, 0.11, respectively). The area under the ROC curve was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86) and 0.77 (0.68-0.85) for a sphericity of 0 and 75, respectively. CAD added a median of 4.4 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 2.7-6.5 minutes) and 2.2 minutes (IQR, 1.2-4.0 minutes) for a sphericity of 0 and 75, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. CAD has the potential to increase the sensitivity of readers inexperienced with CTC, although specificity may be reduced. An increased number of CAD-generated false-positives does not negate any beneficial effect but does reduce efficiency.
Medical subject headings
- Artificial Intelligence
- Attitude of Health Personnel
- Colonic Polyps
- Colonography, Computed Tomographic
- Pattern Recognition, Automated
- Radiographic Image Enhancement
- Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted