Training in difficult conversations: a national survey of pediatric hematology-oncology and pediatric critical care physicians.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19508138.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1089/jpm.2008.0251.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In pediatric oncology and critical care, physicians give difficult news, including discussions regarding palliative care and comfort measures, but there are minimal data regarding fellowship program preparation for this task. We surveyed graduates of pediatric hematology/oncology and critical care fellowships regarding communication training to describe teaching methods, assess which were helpful, and determine whether comfort level is related to training experiences. A 12-question Web survey was sent to physicians completing fellowship in the previous 5 years. Of 345 fellows identified, 171 (50%) responded. Prior training included observing senior physicians (100%), being observed (78%), reading (56%), lectures (46%), role-play (20%), workshops (16%), simulation (13%), and videos (13%). Observing senior physicians was thought most helpful. More years since training (p < 0.0005) and frequent difficult conversations (p = 0.009) were predictors of current comfort. Only workshops were associated with feeling better prepared at the end of training (p = 0.019). Training may help physicians feel prepared for difficult conversations, but ongoing experience was strongly associated with comfort level.
Medical subject headings
- Communication
- Critical Care
- Hematology
- Medical Oncology
- Pediatrics
- Physicians
- Truth Disclosure