Did Darwin write the Origin backwards?
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19528655.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1073/pnas.0901109106 and PMC identifier 2702806.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
After clarifying how Darwin understood natural selection and common ancestry, I consider how the two concepts are related in his theory. I argue that common ancestry has evidential priority. Arguments about natural selection often make use of the assumption of common ancestry, whereas arguments for common ancestry do not require the assumption that natural selection has been at work. In fact, Darwin held that the key evidence for common ancestry comes from characters whose evolution is not caused by natural selection. This raises the question of why Darwin puts natural selection first and foremost in the Origin.
Medical subject headings
- Biological Evolution
- Selection, Genetic