Optical coherence tomography evaluation of zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19535352.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/hrt.2009.167759 and PMC identifier 2775122.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
To evaluate the vascular response at 9 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). These findings were compared with those after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select). Cross-sectional observational study with prospective OCT registry. Nine months after ZES or SES implantation. A total of 68 patients (32 ZES and 36 SES) underwent OCT at 9 months after stent implantation. The neointima hyperplasia (NIH) thickness inside each strut and percentage of NIH area at every 1 mm cross section were measured. The degree of neointimal coverage and the prevalence of malapposition at 9 months after ZES and SES implantation using OCT. The mean (SD) NIH thickness (251.2 (110.0) mum vs 85.5 (53.3) mum, p<0.001) and percentage of NIH area (27.9 (9.1)% vs 11.2 (7.1)%, p<0.001) were significantly greater in ZES than in SES. The prevalence of uncovered strut as well as malapposed strut was significantly lower in ZES than in SES (0.3% vs 12.3%, p<0.001 and 0.08% vs 2.6%, p<0.001). Thrombus was not observed in ZES (0.0% in ZES vs 27.8% in SES, p = 0.001). Neointimal coverage in ZES was almost complete and malapposition was very rare at 9-months' follow-up.
Medical subject headings
- Coronary Stenosis
- Drug-Eluting Stents
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Sirolimus