Pulse contour analysis and transesophageal echocardiography: a comparison of measurements of cardiac output during laparoscopic colon surgery.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19535700.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a491b8.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Pulse wave analysis (PWA) allows cardiac output (CO) measurement after calibration by transpulmonary thermodilution. A PWA system that does not require previous calibration, the FloTrac/Vigileo (FTV), has been recently developed. We compared determinations of CO made with the FTV to simultaneous measurements using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Ten ASA I-II patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery were studied. A radial 20-gauge cannula was inserted and connected to a hemodynamic monitor and a FTV system for PWA and determination of CO (CO(PWA)). TEE CO (CO(TEE)) was determined as previously described. Measurements were made after intubation, 5 min after establishing the lithotomy position, 5 min after establishing pneumoperitoneum, every 30 min, or each time mean arterial blood pressure decreased below basal values. Statistical analysis was made with the Bland and Altman method. Eighty-eight measurements were compared. The CO(TEE) values ranged from 3.23 to 12 Lt/min (mean 6.21 +/- 1.85). Values for CO(PWA) ranged from 2.9 to 8.5 Lt/min (mean 4.84 +/- 1.14). Bias was 1.17 and limits of agreement -2.02 and 4.37. The percentage error between all CO(TEE) and CO(PWA) measurements was 40% (27%-50%) mean (range). During laparoscopic colon surgery, clinically important differences were observed between CO determinations made with TEE and FTV.
Medical subject headings
- Cardiac Output
- Colon
- Echocardiography, Transesophageal
- Laparoscopy
- Monitoring, Intraoperative
- Pulse