Can we improve fixation and outcomes? Use of bone substitutes.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19550228.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181771426.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Hip fractures secondary to osteoporosis are common in the elderly. Stabilizing these fractures until union is achieved is a challenge due to poor bone stock and insufficient purchase of the implant to the bone. The reported high rate of complications has prompted extensive research in the development of fixation techniques. Furthermore, manipulation of both the local fracture environment in terms of application of growth factors, scaffolds, and mesenchymal cells and the systemic administration of agents promoting bone formation and bone strength has been considered as a treatment option with promising results. There are only a few evidence-based studies reporting on fixation augmentation techniques. This article reports on the efficacy of bone graft substitutes for the fixation of hip fractures, in particular calcium phosphates, which have been used as granules, cements, and implant coatings.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Substitutes
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Femoral Neck Fractures
- Fracture Fixation, Internal
Anatomy
- femur