A randomized trial of the traditional sitting position versus the hamstring stretch position for labor epidural needle placement.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19608828.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ac6c79.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Anecdotal and experimental evidence suggest that a sitting position with maximum knee extension, hip adduction, and forward lean (hamstring stretch position) may produce better reversal of the lumbar lordosis than a traditional sitting position. In a randomized trial during initiation of epidural labor analgesia, we compared the traditional versus hamstring stretch positions. The primary outcome was the number of needle-bone contacts. The groups were equivalent with respect to the number of needle-bone contacts. The hamstring stretch position is equivalent to the traditional sitting position in terms of the number of needle-bone contacts encountered when placing labor epidural needles.
Medical subject headings
- Anesthesia, Epidural
- Anesthesia, Obstetrical
- Posture