Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and urinary incontinence: surgical planning based on urodynamics.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19683689.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.022.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to evaluate the use of urodynamics to determine the need for incontinence surgery at the time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC). The records of 441 women undergoing ASC during 2005-2007 were reviewed. Group 1 consisted of 204 women (46.3%) with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI), including occult USI, who underwent incontinence surgery with ASC. Group 2 consisted of 237 women (53.7%) without USI who underwent ASC alone. Primary outcome measures were any complaint of postoperative incontinence (stress or urge) or new-onset urgency/frequency (UF). At a mean follow-up of 46.6 weeks, the overall rate of incontinence was low and similar for both groups (13.4% in group 1 and 13.3% in group 2 [P = .967]), as was new-onset UF: 18.6% in group 1 and 11.5% in group 2 (P = .195). Urodynamic evaluation appears to be useful in determining the need for incontinence surgery at the time of ASC.
Medical subject headings
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress
- Urodynamics
- Urologic Surgical Procedures