Immediate vs delayed intervention for acute coronary syndromes: a randomized clinical trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19724041.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1001/jama.2009.1267.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
International guidelines recommend an early invasive strategy for patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, but the optimal timing of intervention is uncertain. To determine whether immediate intervention on admission can result in a reduction of myocardial infarction compared with a delayed intervention. The Angioplasty to Blunt the Rise of Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Randomized for an Immediate or Delayed Intervention (ABOARD) study, a randomized clinical trial that assigned, from August 2006 through September 2008 at 13 centers in France, 352 patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation and a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score of 3 or more to receive intervention either immediately or on the next working day (between 8 and 60 hours after enrollment). The primary end point was the peak troponin value during hospitalization; the key secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at 1-month follow-up. Time from randomization to sheath insertion was 70 minutes with immediate intervention vs 21 hours with delayed intervention. The primary end point did not differ between the 2 strategies (median [interquartile range] troponin I value, 2.1 [0.3-7.1] ng/mL vs 1.7 [0.3-7.2] ng/mL in the immediate and delayed intervention groups, respectively; P = .70). The key secondary end point was observed in 13.7% (95% confidence interval, 8.6%-18.8%) of the group assigned to receive immediate intervention and 10.2% (95% confidence interval, 5.7%-14.6%) of the group assigned to receive delayed intervention (P = .31). The other end points, as well as major bleeding, did not differ between the 2 strategies. In patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, a strategy of immediate intervention compared with a strategy of intervention deferred to the next working day (mean, 21 hours) did not result in a difference in myocardial infarction as defined by peak troponin level. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00442949.
Medical subject headings
- Abciximab
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Acute Coronary Syndrome/blood
- Acute Coronary Syndrome/mortality
- Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy
- Aged
- Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
- Antibodies, Monoclonal
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
- Anticoagulants
- Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
- Cardiac Catheterization
- Coronary Artery Bypass
- Female
- Hemorrhage
- Hemorrhage/epidemiology
- Hospitalization
- Humans
- Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments
- Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments/therapeutic use
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Myocardial Infarction
- Myocardial Infarction/blood
- Myocardial Infarction/mortality
- Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control
- Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
- Time Factors
- Treatment Outcome
- Troponin
- Troponin/blood