Patient-reported outcomes after combined surgery for pelvic floor disorders in older compared to younger women.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19729141.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.024 and PMC identifier 2783851.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes after combined surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) between older and younger women. This was a retrospective cohort study including 122 younger (<65 years) and 70 older women (>/=65 years old) who underwent combined POP and SUI surgery. SUI and POP treatment failure were based on validated measures. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval [CI]. Mean follow-up was 10 +/- 1.2 months. Women in both age groups reported significant improvement in symptoms and life impact postoperatively. In multivariable analyses, older women had an increased odds of SUI treatment failure (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-2.5), but not POP treatment failure (AOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.29-2.8). Women 65 years and older undergoing combined surgery for POP and SUI are at risk for recurrent SUI, but still experience significant improvements in symptoms and life impact.
Medical subject headings
- Patient Satisfaction
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress