Routine histopathologic evaluation in hallux valgus surgery.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19735633.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3113/FAI.2009.0763.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Anecdotal evidence suggests that specimens submitted for histopathologic assessment during hallux valgus surgery most commonly reveal degenerative changes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of routine examination of tissue from hallux valgus procedures. We hypothesized that such examination rarely diagnoses a new condition and does not alter postoperative management. Specimens from 315 consecutive primary hallux valgus reconstructions performed between November 1995 and August 2002 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient charts were reviewed to determine the number of cases in which new diagnoses were made or treatment altered based upon histopathologic examination. Cost effectiveness was assessed by identifying the reimbursement for professional fees charged for these analyses. The total reimbursement per new diagnosis made and per alteration of treatment were calculated. Degenerative changes were diagnosed in the majority of speciments (97.5%, 307 of 315). Other diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis (1.3%, four of 315), gouty arthritis (1.0%, three of 315), and pseudogout (0.3%, one of 315). A new diagnosis was made only in the one patient (0.3%, one of 315) with pseudogout. Postoperative management was unchanged in every case. Routine submission of specimens obtained during hallux valgus surgery is not cost effective. New diagnoses are very rare and postoperative management did not change.
Medical subject headings
- Diagnostic Errors
- Diagnostic Tests, Routine
- Hallux Valgus