Research ethics and infection control.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19757994.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1086/605666.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The Keystone study of prevention of catheter-related infections in intensive care units raised important issues regarding infection control and research ethics. Infection control is an area common to public health and quality improvement. The performance of surveillance, the reporting of infection control data, and the response to complaints are all obligations raised by the international health regulations. The regulatory system around research ethics focuses on the individual subject in research and is not designed around areas such as infection control. Scientific methods are common to both infection control and research; both may result in "generalizable knowledge." Infection control physicians should work with their institutional review boards to try to streamline the process of ethics review. Regulatory change may be desirable to define and limit what infection control activities are construed as research.
Medical subject headings
- Catheter-Related Infections
- Ethics, Research
- Infection Control