Methods for combining peptide intensities to estimate relative protein abundance.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19892804.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp610.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Labeling techniques are being used increasingly to estimate relative protein abundances in quantitative proteomic studies. These techniques require the accurate measurement of correspondingly labeled peptide peak intensities to produce high-quality estimates of differential expression ratios. In mass spectrometers with counting detectors, the measurement noise varies with intensity and consequently accuracy increases with the number of ions detected. Consequently, the relative variability of peptide intensity measurements varies with intensity. This effect must be accounted for when combining information from multiple peptides to estimate relative protein abundance. We examined a variety of algorithms that estimate protein differential expression ratios from multiple peptide intensity measurements. Algorithms that account for the variation of measurement error with intensity were found to provide the most accurate estimates of differential abundance. A simple Sum-of-Intensities algorithm provided the best estimates of true protein ratios of all algorithms tested.
Medical subject headings
- Algorithms
- Isotope Labeling
- Peptide Mapping
- Proteins