FDA perspective on objective performance goals and clinical trial design for evaluating catheter-based treatment of critical limb ischemia.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19897334.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.045.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The article by Conte et al.(1) on behalf of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) in this issue of the Journal of Vascular Surgery provides guidelines for improving the consistency and interpretability of clinical trials intended to evaluate treatment options for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). This article identifies a number of key challenges with conducting and comparing CLI trials, including the wide spectrum of clinical presentations that CLI encompasses, the use of disparate eligibility criteria and endpoint measurements, and logistical and economic considerations that can limit study initiation and completion. The authors propose definitions for a number of performance goals derived from historical surgical literature as a means of reducing the negative impact of these factors. The current editorial reviews aspects of this proposal from the perspective of the authors in terms of their understanding of the statutory obligations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate the marketing of cardiovascular devices based on valid scientific evidence.
Medical subject headings
- Catheterization, Peripheral
- Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
- Device Approval
- Extremities
- Ischemia
- United States Food and Drug Administration
- Vascular Surgical Procedures