Simple standing incremental cystometry as a screening method for detrusor instability.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1992416.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
One hundred consecutive neurologically normal women complaining of urinary incontinence underwent standing incremental retrograde medium-fill water cystometrograms on two different days followed by sitting and standing continuous retrograde medium-fill water urethrocystometry on a third visit between November 1987 and February 1989. Studies were done to assess the reproducibility, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a simple cystometer. Standing incremental, retrograde cystometry was found to be relatively inexpensive, simple, reproducible, and sensitive. The two cystometrograms yielded similar results in 84% of the patients. The sensitivities were found to be 84.3 and 90.2% for the first and second cystometrograms, respectively. Using both cystometrograms together, we were able to detect detrusor instability with a sensitivity of 92.3% and to predict its absence with a negative predictive value of 86.7%. Detrusor instability was found in 64% of these patients. Based on these results, it was concluded that when multichannel urodynamics are not available in a high-prevalence population, standing retrograde incremental water cystometry done on two occasions may offer the physician an accurate alternative for the diagnosis of detrusor instability.
Medical subject headings
- Muscles
- Urinary Bladder
- Urinary Incontinence