The food industry and self-regulation: standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20019306.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160960 and PMC identifier 2804645.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Threatened by possible government regulation and critical public opinion, industries often undertake self-regulatory actions, issue statements of concern for public welfare, and assert that self-regulation is sufficient to protect the public. The food industry has made highly visible pledges to curtail children's food marketing, sell fewer unhealthy products in schools, and label foods in responsible ways. Ceding regulation to industry carries opportunities but is highly risky. In some industries (e.g., tobacco), self-regulation has been an abject failure, but in others (e.g., forestry and marine fisheries), it has been more successful. We examined food industry self-regulation in the context of other self-regulatory successes and failures and defined 8 standards that should be met if self-regulation is to be effective.
Medical subject headings
- Food Industry
- Health Promotion
- Nutrition Policy
- Social Control, Informal