Impact of pulse oximetry surveillance on rescue events and intensive care unit transfers: a before-and-after concurrence study.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20098128.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ca7a9b.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Some preventable deaths in hospitalized patients are due to unrecognized deterioration. There are no publications of studies that have instituted routine patient monitoring postoperatively and analyzed impact on patient outcomes. The authors implemented a patient surveillance system based on pulse oximetry with nursing notification of violation of alarm limits via wireless pager. Data were collected for 11 months before and 10 months after implementation of the system. Concurrently, matching outcome data were collected on two other postoperative units. The primary outcomes were rescue events and transfers to the intensive care unit compared before and after monitoring change. Rescue events decreased from 3.4 (1.89-4.85) to 1.2 (0.53-1.88) per 1,000 patient discharges and intensive care unit transfers from 5.6 (3.7-7.4) to 2.9 (1.4-4.3) per 1,000 patient days, whereas the comparison units had no change. Patient surveillance monitoring results in a reduced need for rescues and intensive care unit transfers.
Medical subject headings
- Emergency Medical Services
- Intensive Care Units
- Monitoring, Physiologic
- Oximetry
- Transportation of Patients