An audit of the effect of oxygen prescription charts on clinical practice.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20145057.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/pgmj.2009.087528.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The need to improve the prescription, administration and monitoring of oxygen therapy. An interventional, prospective audit. Wellington Hospital, a teaching and tertiary referral hospital in New Zealand in 2007 and 2008. Demonstration of adequate oxygen prescribing, administration and monitoring of oxygen therapy. The introduction of a new drug chart with a specific oxygen prescription section. Targeted educational lectures primarily to medical staff. 610 and 566 patients were reviewed in the first and second audits. After introduction of the new oxygen prescription section on the drug chart the proportion of patients whose oxygen therapy was prescribed increased from 15/85 (17.6%) to 39/98 (39.8%), relative risk 2.3 (95% CI 1.3 to 3.9). The proportion with adequate oxygen prescription, with documentation of device, flow rate or inspired oxygen concentration, and the target oxygen saturation increased from 5/85 (5.9%) to 36/98 (36.7%), relative risk 6.2 (95% CI 2.5 to 15.0). Introduction of the new charts was not associated with changes in clinical practice in terms of assessment of oxygen saturations on room air and commencement if < or = 92%, or the titration of oxygen therapy in response to oxygen saturations < or = 92%. An oxygen prescription section on hospital drug charts improved the prescription of oxygen but did not improve clinical practice. Additional strategies are required to improve the administration of oxygen therapy in hospitals.
Medical subject headings
- Medical Records
- Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
- Prescriptions