Improving normal tissue complication probability models: the need to adopt a "data-pooling" culture.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20171511.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.094 and PMC identifier 2854162.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Clinical studies of the dependence of normal tissue response on dose-volume factors are often confusingly inconsistent, as the QUANTEC reviews demonstrate. A key opportunity to accelerate progress is to begin storing high-quality datasets in repositories. Using available technology, multiple repositories could be conveniently queried, without divulging protected health information, to identify relevant sources of data for further analysis. After obtaining institutional approvals, data could then be pooled, greatly enhancing the capability to construct predictive models that are more widely applicable and better powered to accurately identify key predictive factors (whether dosimetric, image-based, clinical, socioeconomic, or biological). Data pooling has already been carried out effectively in a few normal tissue complication probability studies and should become a common strategy.
Medical subject headings
- Databases, Factual
- Information Dissemination
- Models, Statistical
- Radiation Injuries