Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: a prospective randomized study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20185072.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.013.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Modern cementing techniques have improved glenoid fixation, reduced glenoid lucency seen with keeled components, and may eliminate differences attributable to glenoid design. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of glenoid design on immediate and follow-up radiographic lucency of pegged and keeled glenoid components, using modern cementing techniques. Fifty-three total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized prospectively to receive either a pegged or keeled glenoid component. Three raters graded radiographic glenoid lucencies. On immediate radiographs, there was no significant difference in the rate of glenoid lucency between pegged (0%) and keeled (15%) glenoid components (P = .128). However, after an average of 26 months, the rate of glenoid lucency was significantly higher in patients with keeled components (46%) compared to patients with pegged components (15%) (P = .003). Even with modern cementing techniques, pegged glenoid components remain radiographically superior to keeled glenoid components.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement
- Cementation
- Joint Prosthesis
- Osteoarthritis
- Shoulder Joint
Anatomy
- shoulder