Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20187171.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/bjs.6942.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study assessed the feasibility of a protocol-driven written clinical pathway for multidisciplinary postoperative management after oesophagectomy for oesophageal neoplasia, and examined whether the application of such a protocol could shorten hospital stay and reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. Consecutive patients undergoing transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal neoplasia were divided into those treated between 2003 and 2008 to whom a clinical pathway was applied for postoperative management (group 1), and a control group treated between 1998 and 2002 when no clinical pathway was applied (group 2). There were 74 patients in each group. Morbidity rates were similar in the two groups: 31 per cent in group 1 and 38 per cent in group 2. There were more pulmonary complications in group 2 (23 versus 14 per cent; P = 0.025). One patient (1 per cent) in group 1 and four (5 per cent) in group 2 died after surgery (P = 0.010). The median (range) length of hospital stay was 9 (5-98) days for group 1 and 13 (8-106) days in group 2 (P = 0.012). Use of a written clinical pathway in patients undergoing oesophageal resection significantly reduced pulmonary complications, postoperative mortality and hospital stay.
Medical subject headings
- Critical Pathways
- Esophageal Neoplasms
- Esophagectomy