Brief communication: Management of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in hospice: A nationwide survey.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20194235.
- Also identified by DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-152-5-201003020-00007 and PMC identifier PMC2150628.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Communication about the deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients near the end of life is rare. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospices are admitting patients with ICDs, whether such patients are receiving shocks, and how hospices manage ICDs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Randomly selected hospice facilities. PARTICIPANTS: 900 hospices, 414 of which responded fully. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of admission of patients with ICDs, frequency with which patients received shocks, existence of ICD deactivation policies, and frequency of deactivation. RESULTS: 97% of hospices admitted patients with ICDs, and 58% reported that in the past year, a patient had been shocked. Only 10% of hospices had a policy that addressed deactivation. On average, 42% (95% CI, 37% to 48%) of patients with ICDs had the shocking function deactivated. LIMITATION: The study relied on the knowledge of hospice administrators. CONCLUSION: Hospices are admitting patients with ICDs, and patients are being shocked at the end of life. Ensuring that hospices have policies in place to address deactivation may improve the care for patients with these devices. The authors provide a sample deactivation policy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Aging and National Institute of Nursing Research.