Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility and validity of an indirect volume measurement in transtibial amputees.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the measurement properties of an indirect volumetric measurement using segmental circumferential measurements fitted into a formula of a truncated cone (Sitzia's method) in long-term transtibial amputees. Twenty-eight participants with a transtibial amputation >1 year participated in the study. Two observers measured stump volume twice, two weeks apart, using both Sitzia's method and the water displacement volumetric method (criterion standard test). The mean differences and upper and lower limits of agreement between the water displacement volumetric method and Sitzia's method, between the first and second assessment, and between both assessors were calculated. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were derived from random-effects two-way analysis of variance. Inter-observer agreements of both methods were high and ranged from 86-96%. Intra-observer agreement ranged between 57% and 71%. In both methods the inter- and intra-observer differences were not significant. ICCs ranged from 0.88-0.99 and were better for inter-observer compared to intra-observer reproducibility. Lower stump volumes were observed in Sitzia's method compared to water displacement volumetric method, with high ICC's (0.92-0.95) between both methods. Although Sitzia's method systematically underestimates stump volume, it is a reliable and feasible alternative to the criterion standard test. To determine its validity to detect (longitudinal) differences in stump volume, follow-up research is needed in participants with recent amputations.