Inter-rater reliability of manual muscle strength testing in ICU survivors and simulated patients.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20213068.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00134-010-1796-6 and PMC identifier 2891143.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The goal of the paper is to determine inter-rater reliability of trained examiners performing standardized strength assessments using manual muscle testing (MMT). The authors report on 19 trainees undergoing quality assurance within a multi-site prospective cohort study. Inter-rater reliability for specially trained evaluators ("trainees") and a reference rater, performing MMT using both simulated and actual patients recovering from critical illness was evaluated. Across 26 muscle groups tested by 19 trainee-reference rater pairs, the median (interquartile range) percent agreement and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; 95% CI) were: 96% (91, 98%) and 0.98 (0.95, 1.00), respectively. Across all 19 pairs, the ICC (95% CI) for the overall composite MMT score was 0.99 (0.98-1.00). When limited to actual patients, the ICC was 1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.00). The agreement (kappa; 95% CI) in detecting clinically significant weakness was 0.88 (0.44-1.00). MMT has excellent inter-rater reliability in trained examiners and is a reliable method of comprehensively assessing muscle strength.
Medical subject headings
- Intensive Care Units
- Muscle Strength
- Observer Variation
- Patient Simulation
- Physical Examination
- Reproducibility of Results
- Survivors