How well can radiographers triage x ray films in accident and emergency departments?
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 2021720.
- Also identified by PMC identifier 1669393.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To assess the ability of radiographers to identify abnormal radiographs of patients attending accident and emergency departments. Prospective study over six weeks. Teaching hospital casualty x ray department. 3394 consecutive patients referred for radiography. Radiographs were assessed by radiographers who were offered a four point triage scheme: normal, abnormal, insignificantly abnormal, or further advice required. Comparison of radiographers' assessments with an assessment made independently by the reporting radiologists. Overall disagreement between the radiographers and radiologists was 9.4%. There were 7% false positives and 14% false negatives. Most errors occurred in assessing radiographs of the skull, facial bones, chest, abdomen, and soft tissues. Unselected radiographers can offer useful advice on radiographs to casualty officers, but their high rate of false positive diagnoses indicates that they cannot triage casualty radiographs sufficiently accurately to allow them to extend their current reporting role.
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Competence
- Emergency Service, Hospital
- Radiography
- Triage