Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry.

Abstract

The authors studied the effects of threshold, age, and visual field location on intratest variability in 11 normal subjects between the ages of 15 and 50 years (mean, 35.37 years). The subjects were tested with a conventional manual (Tübinger) perimeter and a high-pass resolution (Ring) perimeter at the following locations: (0 degrees, 30 degrees), (0 degrees, 15 degrees), (0 degrees, -15 degrees), and (0 degrees, -30 degrees). Frequency-of-seeing curves were constructed to obtain accurate estimates of threshold and intratest variability. Although location did not have a significant effect on intratest variability in conventional perimetry, intratest variability increased with threshold (P = 0.031) and age (P = 0.012). The results with resolution perimetry contrasted sharply and showed that neither threshold, age, nor location had a significant effect on intratest variability (P greater than 0.225). Although the thresholds with the two types of perimetry were correlated, intratest variability was not. These results show that resolution perimetry may be able to bypass some of the limitations encountered in obtaining thresholds with conventional perimetry, thereby providing more reliable information.