Patterns of cement distribution in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20381289.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.003.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In this in vitro study, 4 different resurfacing implants have been evaluated with a simulated femoral head: 2 types of cement have been used (low and high viscosity) and 2 different cementing techniques have been performed: direct (cement apposition directly on the femoral head) and indirect (cement poured into the femoral component). High-viscosity cement shows a homogeneous distribution all over the femoral head. Low-viscosity cement shows a massive polar concentration with insufficient if not absent distribution in the equatorial zone. Polar cement concentration could be held as a risk factor for early implant failure. It could have 2 effects on femoral head: biologic (excessive local exothermic reaction could cause necrosis of the osteocytes) and biomechanical (it could lead to uneven load distribution on the femoral head).
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Bone Cements
- Hip Prosthesis
- Models, Anatomic
Anatomy
- hip