Quantitative assessment of spray vs immersion fixation for thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20395528.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1309/AJCP6R3REQLKTLEK.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Whether spray or immersion fixation results in higher adequacy rates for thyroid fine-needle aspiration is not known. I compared 1-year adequacy rates, number of cells, and atypia rates for immersion fixation with split spray fixation and immersion. Adequacy rates increased from 71.9% (289/402) for complete immersion to 78.1% (332/425) with spray fixation of half of the slides (P = .02). The spray-fixed slides had an average + or - SD of 49.7 + or - 47.5 cells compared with their paired immersed slides, with 25.4 + or - 36.8 cells (96% more cells for spray fix; P < .001). Of the 402 immersion cases, 10 (2.5%) were diagnosed as atypical related to preparation artifact compared with 14 (3.3%) of cases with split preparation (P = .48). Spray fixation results in 96% more follicular cells in scant thyroid aspirates than immersion fixation and a significant increase in adequate aspirates without a significant increase in the atypia rate related to preparation.
Medical subject headings
- Biopsy, Fine-Needle
- Thyroid Diseases
- Thyroid Gland
- Tissue Fixation