Two-stage revision of hip prosthesis infection using a hip spacer with stabilising proximal cementation.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20512784.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Two-stage revision hip arthroplasty for infection using an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer has been used frequently with good results. However, spacer instability is also frequent. Proximal cementation of the spacer could avoid spacer dislocation. We retrospectively assessed 35 patients in whom a 2-stage revision hip arthroplasty for infection was carried out using an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer with gentamicin (Spacer-G) in which the spacer was proximally cemented in 16 patients. The mean follow-up was 32 months. We assessed spacer stability and infection elimination. There were 8 spacer dislocations (22.9%), 5 in hips without proximal cementation and 2 in hips with proximal cementation (p>0.05). There was no fracture in any hip. Reinfection occurred in 5 hips (14.3%), in 3 with the same microorganism, while 2 had a different microorganism. Our results indicate that the proximal cementation of the spacer prevents its dislocation. Infection was eliminated in 86% of the hips.
Medical subject headings
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Bone Cements
- Cementation
- Coated Materials, Biocompatible
- Hip Prosthesis
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
Anatomy
- hip