Effect of yellow-tinted intraocular lenses on short-wavelength automated perimetry.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20525530.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.02.023.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To investigate the effect of yellow-tinted intraocular lenses (IOLs) on short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). Cross-sectional observation study. Twenty-two patients who had implantation of yellow-tinted IOLs (AcrySof SN60AT or SN60WF; Alcon Laboratories) in 1 eye and nontinted IOLs (AcrySof SA60AT) in the other eye were included in the study. Standard automated perimetry (SAP) and SWAP were performed. The results for the mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and glaucoma hemifield test results were compared intra-individually. There was no statistically significant difference between the IOLs on the SAP (MD, PSD; P = .851, P = .388, respectively). However, a significant difference was observed between the IOLs on the SWAP (MD, PSD; P = .033, P = .033, respectively). The glaucoma hemifield test did not show significant differences in the SAP (P = .083). However, the SWAP showed significant differences (P = .003). The yellow-tinted IOLs may affect the results of the SWAP; therefore, caution is needed in interpreting the results of the SWAP in eyes with implanted yellow-tinted IOLs.
Medical subject headings
- Cataract Extraction
- Lens Implantation, Intraocular
- Lenses, Intraocular
- Visual Field Tests
- Visual Fields