Quality of life outcomes in revision versus primary total knee arthroplasty.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20541360.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.026.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the quality of life and satisfaction outcomes of patients undergoing primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Sixty revision and 199 primary TKA patients were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford-12 Knee Score, Short Form-12, and patient-reported satisfaction. Baseline preoperative scores demonstrate that revision TKA patients have inferior quality of life across all measures (WOMAC, Oxford-12, and Short Form-12) in comparison with primary TKA patients (P < .05). At follow-up revision, TKA patients continue to have inferior outcomes (P < .05) in comparison with primary TKA patients. When adjusting for confounding factors in regression analyses, revisions are inferior to primary TKA by 8.6 (95% confidence interval, 2.7-14.6) normalized WOMAC units.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care
- Quality of Life
Anatomy
- knee