How often is a low Apgar score the result of substandard care during labour?
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20549871.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To increase our knowledge of the occurrence of substandard care during labour. A population-based case-control study. Stockholm County. Infants born in the period 2004-2006 in Stockholm County. Cases and controls were identified from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, had a gestational age of +/-33 complete weeks, had planned for a vaginal delivery, and had a normal cardiotocographic (CTG) recording on admission. We compared 313 infants with an Apgar score of < 7 at 5 minutes of age with 313 randomly selected controls with a full Apgar score, matched for year of birth. Substandard care during labour. We found that 62% of cases and 36% of controls were subject to some form of substandard care during labour. In half of the cases and in 12% of the controls, CTG was abnormal for > or = 45 minutes before birth. Fetal blood sampling was not performed in 79% of both cases and controls, when indicated.Oxytocin was provided without signs of uterine inertia in 20% of both cases and controls. Uterine contractions were hyperstimulated by oxytocin in 29% of cases and in 9% of controls, and the dose of oxytocin was increased despite abnormal CTG in 19% and 6% of cases and controls, respectively. Assuming that substandard care is a risk factor for low Apgar score, we estimate that up to 42% of the cases could be prevented by avoiding substandard care. There was substandard care during labour of two thirds of infants with a low Apgar score. The main reasons for substandard care were related to misinterpretation of CTG, not acting on an abnormal CTG in a timely fashion and incautious use of oxytocin.
Medical subject headings
- Apgar Score
- Labor, Obstetric
- Prenatal Care