Mechanisms implicated in the histamine response of the sheep ureterovesical junction.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 2056588.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The isotonic response of the sheep ureterovesical junction to histamine receptor agonists and antagonists was studied in vitro. Histamine (10(-7)-10(-4) M) produced a concentration-dependent contraction which was dependent on the extracellular calcium concentrations. Nifedipine (10(-9)-10(-6) M) partially inhibited the contractile response to histamine. 2-Methylhistamine and 2-pyridylethylamine elicited contractile effect in a concentration-related manner. The order of potency was histamine greater than 2-methylhistamine greater than 2-pyridylethylamine. Dimaprit and 4-methylhistamine produced no response in this tissue. The histamine contraction was antagonized by mepyramine, the pA2 value being 8.41, but not by cimetidine (10(-4) M). Scopolamine (10(-5) M) and indomethacin (10(-6) M) had an inhibitory effect. Phentolamine (10(-5) M), propranolol (10(-7)) and hexamethonium (10(-6) M) did not alter the histamine-induced contractions. The present results indicate that the response to histamine in sheep ureterovesical junction is mediated mainly by a direct action on the smooth muscle through excitatory histamine H1-receptors and partly by an indirect action via the stimulation of intramural cholinergic nerves.
Medical subject headings
- Histamine
- Ureter
- Urinary Bladder