Improving target delineation on 4-dimensional CT scans in stage I NSCLC using a deformable registration tool.
Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20570381.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.05.003.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Correct target definition is crucial in stereotactic radiotherapy for lung tumors. We evaluated use of deformable registration (DR) for target contouring on 4-dimensional (4D) CT scans. Three clinicians contoured gross tumor volume (GTV) in an end-inspiration phase of 4DCT of 6 patients on two occasions. Two clinicians contoured GTVs in all phases of 4DCT and on maximum intensity projections (MIP). The initial GTV was auto-propagated to 9 other phases using a B-spline algorithm (VelocityAI). Internal target volumes (ITVs) generated were (i) ITV(10manual) encompassing all physician-contoured GTVs, (ii) ITV-MIP(optimized) from MIP after review of individual 4DCT phases, (iii) ITV(10deformed) encompassing auto-propagated GTVs using DR, and (iv) ITV(10deformed-optimized), from an ITV(10deformed) target that was modified to form a 'clinically optimal' ITV. Volume-overlaps were scored using Dice's Similarity Coefficients (DSCs). Intra-clinician GTV reproducibility was greater than inter-clinician reproducibility (mean DSC 0.93 vs. 0.88, p<0.0004). In five of 6 patients, ITV-MIP(optimized) differed from the ITV(10deformed-optimized). In all patients, the DSC between ITV(10deformed-optimized) and ITV(10deformed) was higher than that between ITV(10deformed-optimized) and ITV-MIP(optimized) (p<0.02 T-test). ITVs created in stage I tumors using DR were closer to 'clinically optimal' ITVs than was the case with a MIP-modified approach.
Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography
- Lung Neoplasms
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted