Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads under advisory.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20591841.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq203 and PMC identifier 2938466.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Automatic daily transmission of data from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) enables the remote monitoring of device status and leads function. We report on a 2-year experience with remote monitoring in 40 recipients of high-voltage ICD leads, prone to fracture and under advisory since October 2007. The ICDs were remotely monitored as well as systematically interrogated in the ambulatory department every 3 months. The patients were also seen in case of abnormal lead impedance, or other manifestations consistent with lead dysfunction. Over a mean follow-up of 22 ± 4 months after ICD implantation, four lead dysfunctions were suspected because of remotely transmitted oversensing of noise artifacts, abrupt rise in pacing impedance, or both. A lead fracture needing lead replacement was confirmed in three patients (7.5%), two of them before any inappropriate therapy and one after the delivery of three inappropriate shocks. No lead failure was observed in the remaining 36 patients, either at the time of ambulatory visits or during remote monitoring. Remote monitoring allowed the early and reliable detection of ICD leads failure without requiring any patient intervention.
Medical subject headings
- Defibrillators, Implantable
- Monitoring, Ambulatory
- Telemedicine