Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20605133.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.038.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We performed a metaanalysis of publications comparing the efficacy and safety of cervical ripening and labor induction by Foley catheter balloon (FCB) vs locally applied prostaglandins (LAPG) in the third trimester of pregnancy. Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (1966-2008; 3532 participants) were selected from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL searches. There was no significant difference between FCB and LAPG in cesarean delivery rates. LAPG had a significantly increased risk of excessive uterine activity (P = .001). FCB had a significantly higher risk of oxytocin induction/augmentation during labor (P = .0002). Cervical prostaglandin-E2 was less effective (P = .04), and vaginal prostaglandin-E1 bore a significantly higher risk of excessive uterine activity (P < .0001) and meconium staining (P = .04). We concluded that FCB and LAPG result in similar cesarean delivery rates, that FCB bears a higher risk of oxytocin use for labor induction and/or augmentation, and that LAPG carries a higher risk of contraction abnormalities.
Medical subject headings
- Catheterization
- Cervical Ripening
- Labor, Induced
- Prostaglandins