Complications and concerns with osteobiologics for spine fusion in clinical practice.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20628338.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce11cc.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Literature-based topic review. To review the complications and the concerns that may be associated with all of the commonly used osteobiologic options for spine fusion. Obtaining a solid arthrodesis is an important objective in many lumbar surgical procedures, and a wide array of bone graft materials may be used in an attempt to achieve this goal. Iliac crest bone graft, as well as all of the available osteobiologic alternatives, carries potential risks and concerns for both patient and surgeon. Review of literature and expert opinion. Some of the potential complications associated with osteobiologic materials used in spinal fusion are well understood and clearly documented whereas others require further study and clarification. In any given clinical situation, the patient and surgeon need to balance the benefits and performance characteristics of the graft material with the risk profile to optimize clinical management.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Morphogenetic Proteins
- Bone Transplantation
- Spinal Fusion