Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20633870.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.033.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We sought to determine the validity of colposcopically directed cervical biopsies as a diagnostic test to define the degree of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). In a prospective multicenter trial, patients undergoing excisional procedures of the transformation zone additionally had colposcopy and up to 3 guided cervical biopsies in a single procedure. Cervical biopsies were regarded as a diagnostic test to detect high-grade lesions (CIN 2,3), with the cone specimen as reference standard. In all, 488 biopsies were performed in 244 cases, with 2 biopsies done in 192 cases. Cervical biopsies underestimated the severity of lesions in 46.7% of cases. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 66.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.4-72.3), 95.0% (95% CI, 83.5-98.6), 98.5% (95% CI, 94.8-99.6), and 35.5% (95% CI, 27.1-44.9), respectively. Our data suggest that cytologically suspected high-grade lesions (CIN 2,3) can be confirmed by biopsy in many cases, but they cannot be excluded.
Medical subject headings
- Cervix Uteri
- Colposcopy
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia