Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20634039.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2010.05.015.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
An extensive database search was completed to perform a meta-analysis of outcomes of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Nineteen manuscripts encompassing 3506 total knee arthroplasty met criteria for analysis (average follow-up, 8.6 years). Data were subdivided based on design type and included rotating platform, meniscal bearing, and anterior-posterior glide-rotation subgroups. Fifteen-year survivorship of rotating platform designs (96.4%) was greater than meniscal bearing implants (86.5%). Mean component loosening (0.33%) and bearing instability (<1%) for all subgroups were uncommon. Implants placed prior to 1995 exhibited higher rates of bearing complications (1.6% vs 0.1%). Excellent results were obtained with mobile-bearing TKA over 2 decades. Loosening and bearing instability were uncommon. Bearing complications lessened after 1995, possibly secondary to improved surgical technique.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Knee Prosthesis
- Prosthesis Design
Anatomy
- knee