Effects of vitreomacular adhesion on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20678805.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.04.015.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of posterior vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), documented by optical coherence tomography (OCT), on the outcome of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Retrospective comparative series. A total of 148 patients (148 eyes) who were newly diagnosed with exudative AMD and were treated by anti-VEGF in 1 eye from 2005 to 2008 with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed OCT and medical records of 148 patients with exudative AMD and categorized them according to the presence of posterior VMA into 2 subgroups: VMA (+) group (38 eyes) and VMA (-) group (110 eyes). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) after anti-VEGF treatment were compared between the 2 groups at baseline; at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; and at the last visit (mean = 21 months). Mean changes in BCVA, which was converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) values and CRT after anti-VEGF treatment. Mean BCVA significantly decreased over time in the VMA (+) group compared with the VMA (-) group (P = 0.039). At the last follow-up, mean BCVA had deteriorated from 0.87 logMAR (20/149 Snellen equivalent; baseline) to 0.98 logMAR (20/189 Snellen equivalent) in the VMA (+) group, but improved from 0.82 logMAR (20/132 Snellen equivalent, baseline) to 0.72 logMAR (20/104, Snellen equivalent) in the VMA (-) group (P = 0.028). In paired comparisons of BCVA between baseline and each follow-up visit, the VMA (-) group showed significant improvement of BCVA at every follow-up visit (P < 0.05); however, the VMA (+) group did not show significant visual improvement at any follow-up visit despite anti-VEGF treatment (P > 0.05). Comparison of mean CRT between baseline and each follow-up visit showed a statistically significant decrease at every follow-up in both groups (P < 0.05). Posterior VMA was associated with an inferior visual outcome after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for exudative AMD. Our results suggest that chronic tractional forces may antagonize the effect of anti-VEGF treatment, resulting in poor response to anti-VEGF treatment with patients with VMA.
Medical subject headings
- Angiogenesis Inhibitors
- Macula Lutea
- Macular Degeneration
- Tissue Adhesions
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
- Vitreous Body