Prediction models for prolonged intensive care unit stay after cardiac surgery: systematic review and validation study.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20679549.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.926808.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Several models have been developed to predict prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery. However, no extensive quantitative validation of these models has yet been conducted. This study sought to identify and validate existing prediction models for prolonged ICU length of stay after cardiac surgery. After a systematic review of the literature, the identified models were applied on a large registry database comprising 11 395 cardiac surgical interventions. The probabilities of prolonged ICU length of stay based on the models were compared with the actual outcome to assess the discrimination and calibration performance of the models. Literature review identified 20 models, of which 14 could be included. Of the 6 models for the general cardiac surgery population, the Parsonnet model showed the best discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.75 [95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.76]), followed by the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) (0.71 [0.70 to 0.72]) and a model by Huijskes and colleagues (0.71 [0.70 to 0.73]). Most of the models showed good calibration. In this validation of prediction models for prolonged ICU length of stay, 2 widely implemented models (Parsonnet, EuroSCORE), although originally designed for prediction of mortality, were superior in identifying patients with prolonged ICU length of stay.
Medical subject headings
- Cardiac Surgical Procedures
- Intensive Care Units
- Length of Stay
- Models, Statistical