Community participation: measurement issues with persons with deficits in executive functioning.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20801283.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.032.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Deficits in executive functioning and self-regulation, which are characteristic of many rehabilitation populations, can interfere with the provision of accurate and reliable responses to surveys designed to measure psychosocial constructs, including community participation. Using the Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology paradigm, survey researchers have found that respondents proceed through 4 processes that draw heavily on executive functions: (1) question comprehension and interpretation, (2) retrieval of applicable information from memory, (3) integration of retrieved information to form a judgment, and (4) configuration or mapping of the judgment to the response choices. Respondents without cognitive deficits frequently make errors because of challenges to their executive functions; it should therefore be anticipated that persons with deficits in executive functions will have even greater difficulties providing consistent and accurate responses. Research with persons with executive functioning deficits that empirically evaluates the various strategies recommended by survey researchers is sorely needed. At a minimum, survey design and administration should take into account potential sources of error resulting from executive functioning deficits by testing and incorporating strategies for reducing error.
Medical subject headings
- Cognition Disorders
- Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation
- Executive Function
- Humans
- Interpersonal Relations
- Judgment
- Memory, Short-Term
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods
- Research Design
- Surveys and Questionnaires