Outcomes and practical information for patients choosing nonoperative treatment for distal biceps ruptures.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20806773.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3928/01477447-20100429-10.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients selecting nonoperative treatment for distal biceps tendon ruptures to provide information to patients and caregivers to consider in decision making. Five men conservatively treated for distal biceps tendon rupture between November 2002 and December 2006 were compared to 5 age-matched controls treated operatively. Outcomes at 4.5 years included supination strength, range of motion, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Two groups of 9 normal volunteers--1 young group averaging 30.7 years and 1 older group averaging 48.8 years--served as controls. In nonoperative patients, elbow supination strength in the injured arm was 4.14 Nm (SD 0.94) and in the uninjured arm was 4.91 Nm (SD 0.65). In operative patients, supination strength was 4.25+/-1.08 Nm in the operatively repaired arm and 5.74+/-1.27 Nm in the uninjured arm. Age-matched normal patients had supination strength of 5.78+/-1.46 Nm in the dominant arm and 5.59+/-1.32 Nm in the nondominant arm. The ASES score averaged 89.57, with 3 patients reporting pain, compared to a score of 87.5 in the operative patients. Patients choosing conservative treatment for distal biceps ruptures have residual pain and weakness approximately double that seen between normal dominant and non-dominant extremities.
Medical subject headings
- Muscle, Skeletal
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Patient Education as Topic
- Tendon Injuries