Long-term outcomes of osseointegrated digital prostheses for proximal amputations.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20807721.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/1753193410382720.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This paper presents outcomes after 13, 4, and 3½ years in three digital amputees treated with osseointegrated prostheses. One had prosthetic replacement of the index and middle fingers at the PIP level. The second had four fingers replaced at the PIP level, but only three prostheses were retained. The third had a thumb replacement at the MCP level. All patients scored their reconstructed hand highly in terms of appearance and frequency of use. The first and third patients rated the function of the reconstructed hand as similar to the normal hand, and this was confirmed by the Jebsen Test, but the second patient had poor function. All patients could detect pressure and vibration through their prostheses, although grip and pinch strengths were weaker in all three. All three also experienced some pain in the implanted fingers. This study identifies osseointegration as a stable long-term reconstructive option.
Medical subject headings
- Amputation, Traumatic
- Finger Injuries
- Fingers
- Osseointegration
- Prostheses and Implants