Estimation of maximal work rate based on the 6-minute walk test and fat-free mass in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 20875524.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.002.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To propose a predictive equation of the maximal work rate (Wmax) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on the product of 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and fat-free mass (FFM) and to compare it with a previously proposed equation based on the product of 6MWT and body weight (BW). Descriptive (cross-sectional) study. University-based rehabilitation center. Patients with COPD (N=53; 30 men; forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 45%±15% predicted). Not applicable. Three Wmax were produced: Wmax_real (obtained from the maximal cycle ergometry test), Wmax_BW (estimated from the product of 6MWT and BW), previously proposed by Hill et al. (Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89(9):1782-7); and Wmax_FFM (estimated from the product of 6MWT and FFM). The equation derived from a regression model to estimate Wmax_FFM was as follows: -27.9717+3.7792*(6MWT*FFM). Wmax_real correlated better with Wmax_FFM (r=.64) than with Wmax_BW (r=.54). There was no difference between Wmax_FFM (median [interquartile range], 41 [29-50] W) and Wmax_real (40 [20-50] W, P=.88), whereas Wmax_BW (60 [52-69] W) significantly overestimated Wmax_real (P<.0001). In patients with COPD, Wmax is better estimated by an equation including the product of 6MWT and FFM than by a previously proposed equation including the product of 6MWT and body weight.
Medical subject headings
- Body Composition
- Exercise Test
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Walking