Fixed versus rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Abstract

The purpose of this randomized, single-blind clinical trial was to compare a rotating platform (RP) total knee arthroplasty to a fixed-bearing (FB) total knee arthroplasty. Ninety-five knees in 69 patients were implanted by 2 surgeons. There were no significant differences in the preoperative demographics. At a minimum of 2-year follow-up, clinical outcomes and complication rates were similar, with the exception that the RP group had significantly better stair-climbing scores (P = .04). Postoperative range of motion was equally good in both groups (FB knees, 1°-125°; RP knees, 1-126°). There were no bearing dislocations in the RP group. In conclusion, this RP design performs at least as well as the FB version, and the RP patients reported better stair-climbing ability. Enthusiasm for this finding should be tempered by the relatively small sample size.