Interval growth of probably benign breast lesions on follow-up ultrasound: how can these be managed?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21113596.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-010-2012-3.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To investigate the malignancy rate in probably benign lesions with interval growth on follow-up ultrasound (US) and the cut-off values for predicting malignancy. By retrospective reviewing 19,435 US examinations assessed as probably benign lesions, a total of 214 lesions with interval growth in 199 patients were included. The increased volume (%V),%V per month, the most increased diameter (D), and D per month were compared between malignant and benign lesions. Malignancy rates were compared between lesions with or without newly developed suspicious malignant features. Twenty-two (10.3%) malignancies showed significant increase in%V,%V per month, D, and D per month compared with 192 (89.7%) benign lesions (p = 0.0083, <0.0001, <0.0001, and <0.0001, respectively). Fifteen (38.5%) of 39 lesions where suspicious features developed proved malignant, whereas 7 (4%) out of 175 without were malignant (p = 0.0011). In nodules without suspicious features, 24.2% of%V per month and 1.9 mm of D per month showed high sensitivity (85.7% and 71.4%) and specificity (67.8% and 97.6%) for predicting malignancy. Probably benign lesions with interval growth should undergo prompt biopsy because of the 10.3% malignancy rate. In lesions where suspicious features developed, the malignancy rate increased to 38.5%.
Medical subject headings
- Breast
- Breast Neoplasms
- Ultrasonography
- Ultrasonography, Mammary