Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21145033.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.024 and PMC identifier 3090039.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Power spectrum (PS) of uterine electromyography (EMG) can identify true labor. EMG propagation velocity (PV) to diagnose labor has not been reported. The objective was to compare uterine EMG against current methods to predict preterm delivery. EMG was recorded in 116 patients (preterm labor, n = 20; preterm nonlabor, n = 68; term labor, n = 22; term nonlabor, n = 6). A Student t test was used to compare EMG values for labor vs nonlabor (P < .05, significant). Predictive values of EMG, Bishop score, contractions on tocogram, and transvaginal cervical length were calculated using receiver-operator characteristics analysis. PV was higher in preterm and term labor compared with nonlabor (P < .001). Combined PV and PS peak frequency predicted preterm delivery within 7 days with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96. Bishop score, contractions, and cervical length had an AUC of 0.72, 0.67, and 0.54. Uterine EMG PV and PS peak frequency more accurately identify true preterm labor than clinical methods.
Medical subject headings
- Electromyography
- Obstetric Labor, Premature
- Uterine Contraction
- Uterine Monitoring