Comparing support to breast cancer patients from online communities and face-to-face support groups.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21159482.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2010.11.008.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare support for three groups by considering usage patterns with regard to two peer support resources, online communities, and face-to-face support groups, among patients with breast cancer in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1039 breast cancer patients. RESULTS: Factor analysis indicated that all groups show the five aspects of support: "Emotional support/Helper therapy," "Emotional expression," "Conflict," "Advice," and "Insight/Universality." Within the group using two support resources, the support scores of "Emotional expression" and "Advice" were higher for the online community, and those of "Emotional support/Helper therapy," and "Insight/Universality" were higher for the face-to-face support group. Among the three groups, the members who received the most peer support were those who used both an online community and a face-to-face support group. CONCLUSION: Patients who received the most social support from peers were in the group using both online communities and face-to-face support groups. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare providers should provide information about peer support through not only traditional face-to-face support groups but also online communities.