Non-hardware posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using knot/press-fit technique with periosteum-enveloped hamstrings tendon autograft.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21270353.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/0363546510391178.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Several posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures have been proposed to manage ruptures. This study was intended to present the clinical results of non-hardware reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament using a knot/press-fit technique with periosteum-enveloped autogenous hamstring tendons. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. This arthroscopically assisted technique was used in 33 patients with posterior cruciate ligament ruptures. In this non-hardware technique, semitendinosus and gracilis tendons were prepared as 2 loops with knots. Each loop was enveloped in periosteum. After passing a bottleneck femoral tunnel, the grafts were fixed with a press-fit method (knotted grafts lodging in the bottleneck of the femoral tunnel). Simultaneously, the intra-articular opening of the tibial tunnel was filled with the periosteum-enveloped portion of the graft. A tie with Mersilene tape over a bone bridge for each tendon loop was used for tibial fixation. The average follow-up was 35 months (range, 24-60 months). Clinical assessments included Tegner score, Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, thigh muscle assessment, and radiographic evaluation. The stress radiography results for posterior displacement changed from 13.7 ± 2.1 mm preoperatively to 4.8 ± 1.1 mm postoperatively. Average preinjury Tegner score was 5.9 (range, 3-9), decreasing to 2.9 (range, 2-5) preoperatively and increasing to 5.2 (range, 2-9) postoperatively. The Lysholm score increased from 58.5 ± 5.2 to 94.2 ± 4.1 (P < .01). Finally, 26 patients (89.7%) were assessed as nearly normal by International Knee Documentation Committee guidelines. The study revealed satisfactory clinical subjective and objective results at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Without using hardware, this alternative technique has the advantage of no need for removal of hardware and potentially easier magnetic resonance imaging interpretation and revision surgery.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty
- Arthroscopy
- Knee Injuries
- Posterior Cruciate Ligament
- Postoperative Complications
- Tendons
Anatomy
- knee